Not a ‘Pennymore’ for son who claimed he’d been promised his farmer father’s estate banner

News and Insight

Home / News and Insight / Legal News / Not a ‘Pennymore’ for son who claimed he’d been promised his farmer father’s estate

Not a ‘Pennymore’ for son who claimed he’d been promised his farmer father’s estate

Insisting someone promised you something before they died is not a good enough reason to have their Will overturned in your favour, a recent High Court case shows.

Farmer's son, Sam James, sued his mother and sisters for ownership of his late father's £3m farm but has now been told by Judge Matthews in the High Court in Bristol that he is not entitled to a share.

Background

Sam James said he had devoted his whole life to working for his father on the 'promise' that one day hundreds of acres of land at Pennymore Pitt Farm in Dorset would be his.

But when Allen James died at the age of 81 in 2012, he completely cut his son out of his Will, leaving everything to his wife and two daughters.

Sam challenged the Will but Judge Matthews concluded his father was well within his rights when he made his decision.

Persuaded himself he was being promised

Judge Matthews said: "In my judgement, Sam's eagerness to inherit the farmland from his father caused him to persuade himself that he was being promised something when he was not. Allen James did not intend his words in that way, and did not intend them to be relied upon subsequently by Sam.

"It is not consistent with the image of Mr James as someone who kept everything in his own hands and did not confide in others."

'Worked his socks off'

The court heard that Sam James left school early and worked for the family business for 35 years. His barrister said he was an 'absolute grafter' who 'worked his socks off' and claimed he was a 'driving force' in the family business.

In 2004, Allen James instructed solicitors to draft a Will leaving the farm and land to Sam but his wife objected and it was never executed. The following Will, which disinherited Sam entirely, was objected to by Sam because he claimed his father lacked testamentary capacity at the time he signed it.

Importantly, one of the factors relevant to the court's decision seems to have been that Sam had not worked for nothing on the family farm - as had been the case in previous cases on similar facts - but had been paid the going rate.

For help and advice about probate disputes, please contact our specialist disputes team at Wards Solicitors by phone or by popping into one of our 11 local offices.

    Get in Touch




    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. The Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Important notice: please read

    Cyber-crime is on the increase and solicitor transactions can be hijacked by scammers. This commonly takes the form of email or phone interception.  At the start of our working relationship we will provide you with terms of business that include our account details – these will never change.

    Please be aware that we will never ask you to send money to a different bank account, particularly by email. If you receive a request for money from us please check that everything matches the details in our terms of business.

    If you receive an email giving any other bank account please telephone us immediately without replying to the email or sending any money. We accept no responsibility if you transfer money to a bank account which is not ours.

    Wards Solicitors